In this episode, Philippa talks to Vernon Dennis about why he has come to see governance and culture as the real reasons businesses succeed or fail, why ESG is not a separate compliance exercise, and what directors actually need to do to discharge their duties in a world where “non-financial” misconduct is anything but.
Vernon Dennis is a partner at Howard Kennedy Solicitors, where he leads the firm’s business advisory practice and specialises in restructuring, insolvency and corporate turnaround. Over 35 years advising boards, creditors and businesses in financial distress, he has had a front row seat to what happens when governance succeeds and when it fails. His book, Directors’ Duties, ESG and Sustainable Strategies, argues that ESG belongs at the heart of good governance, risk management and long-term business success – not on the periphery.
Most businesses that fail blame the outside world: Brexit, war, energy prices, unforeseen events. Vernon’s argument, after three and a half decades of watching them fall over, is that the outside world is rarely the real cause. Underneath almost every failure sits a failure of governance and culture – the way decisions get made, the way rules line up with the vision and values, and the way businesses behave when they think no one is looking.
In this conversation, you’ll hear about:
- Why Vernon came to ESG through insolvency rather than sustainability law, and what 35 years of restructuring taught him about the commonality beneath every business failure.
- The distinction between a business plan and a sustainable strategy, and why a real strategy should look more like a Haynes manual than a five-year projection.
- Section 172 of the Companies Act, and why the director’s duty to promote the success of the company is already an ESG duty, whether directors realise it or not.
- Why culture is “like the wind” – visible only in its effects – and why misalignment between values, remuneration and behaviour is what really brings businesses down.
- Why for individuals ESG is about ethics, but for companies it is fundamentally about risk management.
- The rise of greenwashing and transition litigation, and why misleading disclosures are increasingly ending up in court.
- How directors get themselves into trouble: not through irrational decisions, but through decisions they simply never got around to considering.
- Why over-reliance on compliance and box-ticking is one of the most dangerous patterns Vernon sees in boardrooms.
- Materiality: identifying the “emerging strategic disruptive factors” for your business, and why every list looks different.
- The value of external experts and diversity of thought as a defence against boards marking their own homework.
- The Enron and Madoff pattern of “someone else will spot it”, and why a real speak-up culture only works where trust is real.
- Vernon’s own penny-drop moment: a client case where the incident itself was not the fatal blow – it was how the business responded that caused the reputational and financial damage.
Key takeaway
Vernon’s argument is that there is no such thing as “non-financial” misconduct. Anything that touches culture, values, employees, suppliers, customers or the environment will eventually touch the balance sheet – through litigation, reputational damage or lost trust. The way to protect against this is not more compliance policies sitting in a folder. It is a sustainable strategy genuinely embedded in the board’s decision-making, subject to regular audit and review, and honest about the emerging factors that could take the business down. Get advice early, bring in outside challenge, ask what a reasonable director would have done, and treat culture as the default your business falls back on when things get hard.
Want more practical ideas on ESG and purposeful leadership?
Follow Life Matters More and never miss an episode.
Subscribe here to listen on your favourite podcast platform.
The following podcast is intended to be of a general nature, will not be suitable for everyone, and should not be treated as a specific recommendation. We recommend taking professional advice before entering into any obligation or transaction.
PNr portfolios adopt a diversified, cost‑efficient approach aimed at maximising risk‑adjusted returns. As a secondary consideration, the portfolios prioritise selecting fund managers who effectively engage with underlying companies on environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters. Most underlying funds also incorporate ESG factors and exclusions into the fund construction. PNr portfolios are not designed to achieve specific sustainability outcomes and should not be viewed as “sustainable” investments.
PNi portfolios take a more targeted sustainability approach, seeking closer alignment with defined environmental and/or social outcomes, and which are predominantly defined by UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Definitions of ethical investing vary, and incorporating ESG or sustainability factors does not guarantee positive outcomes or investment performance. The value of investments can fall as well as rise, and you may get back less than you originally invested. The suitability of any investment will depend on your individual circumstances.